Intersubjectivity and the Shared Third Perspective in the Therapeutic Relationship

Authors

  • Jose Manuel Martínez Rodriguez

Keywords:

Intersubjectivity, integrative psychotherapy, autism spectrum disorder, Asperger’s syndrome, mirroring, mirroring relating

Abstract

The relationship between two people and their own individual subjectivity, each with their own mental processes, requires mutual recognition of the existence, needs, and perspective of the other. The recognition of subjectivity in the therapeutic relationship is a co-created process that leads to a shared third perspective from which to reflect about the relationship and regulate the conflicts of the dyad. In integrative psychotherapy, the recognition of the client and the therapist as two different subjectivities co-creating the therapeutic relationship is expressed through inquiry, attunement, and involvement with the relationship’s four components: acknowledgment, normalization, validation, and presence (Erskine, 1997, 2015; Erskine & Trautmann, 1996). The client may bring through transference with the therapist old relationships in which his or her subjective perspective was not sufficiently taken into account. The intersubjective therapeutic relationship is a co-created process in which the two participating subjectivities experience a “shared third perspective,” from which both can reflect on their own relationship and feel a sense of “we.” Recognizing that the client has a separate mind with their own needs and experiences is key to treating disorders of the self, fostering the evolution of the subject from his or her arrest at an experience of disconnected emerging self-states, such as psychosis, Autism spectrum disorder, Asperger’s syndrome, etc., acquiring a coherent a nuclear self and, beyond, experiencing an intersubjective and verbal self (Stern, 1985).

References

Atwood, G. E., & Stolorow, R. D. (1984). Structures of subjectivity: Explorations in psychoanalytic phenomenology. Analytic Press.

Baron-Cohen, S., Leslie, A. M., & Frith, U. (1985). Does the autistic child have a “theory of mind?” Cognition, 21(1), 37–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(85)90022-8

Beebe, B., & Lachmann, F. M. (2002). Infant research and adult treatment: Co-constructing interactions. Analytic Press.

Benjamin, J. (2004). Beyond doer and done to: An intersubjective view of thirdness. The Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 73(1), 5–46. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2167-4086.2004.tb00151.x

Berne, E. (1958). Transactional analysis: A new and effective method of group therapy. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 12(4), 735–743. https://doi.org/10.1176/

appi.psychotherapy.1958.12.4.735

Berne, E. (1961). Transactional analysis in psychotherapy: A systematic individual and social psychiatry. Grove Press.

Berne, E. (1964). Games people play: The basic handbook of transactional analysis. Grove Press.

Bizzari, V. (2018). “Like in a shell:” Interaffectivity and social cognition in Asperger´s Syndrome. Thaumàzein, 6, 158–179. https://doi.org/10.13136/thau.v6i0.97

Carroll, L. (1986). A través del espejo y lo que Alicia encontró allí [Through the looking-glass and what Alice found there] (L. Maristany, Trans.). Plaza y Janés Editora. (Original work published 1871)

DeYoung, P. A. (2003). Relational psychotherapy: A primer. Routledge. https://

doi.org/10.4324/9781315810911

Erskine, R. G. (1991). Transference and transactions: Critique from an intrapsychic and integrative perspective. Transactional Analysis Journal, 21, 63–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/036215379102100202

Erskine, R. G. (1997). The therapeutic relationship: Integrating motivation and personality theories. In Theories and methods of an integrative transactional analysis: A volume of selected articles (pp. 7–19). TA Press.

Erskine, R. G. (2015). Relational patterns, therapeutic presence: Concepts and practice of integrative psychotherapy. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/

9780429479519

Erskine, R. G., & Trautmann, R. L. (1996). Methods of an integrative psychotherapy. Transactional Analysis Journal, 26(4), 316–328. https://doi.org/

10.1177/036215379602600410

Fonagy, P., Gergely, G., Jurist, E. L., & Target, M. (2002). Affect regulation, mentalization, and the development of the self. Other Press.

Frankl, G. (1943). Language and affective contact. The Nervous Child, 2(3), 251–262.

Ghent, E. (1990). Masochism, submission, surrender: Masochism as a perversion of surrender. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 26(1), 108–136. https://doi.org/

10.1080/00107530.1990.10746643

Goulding, R. (1972). New directions in transactional analysis: Creating an environment for redecision and change. In C. J. Sager & H. S. Kaplan (Eds.), Progress in group and family therapy (pp. 105–134). Brunner/Mazel.

Goulding, R. L., & Goulding, M. M. (1978). The power is in the patient: A TA/Gestalt approach to psychotherapy. TA Press.

Goulding, M. M., & Goulding, R. L. (1979). Changing lives through redecision therapy. Grove Press.

Greenspan, S. I. (1997). The growth of the mind and the endangered origins of intelligence. Addison-Wesley.

Grimm, J., & Grimm, W. (2015). Jacob y Wilhelm Grimm: Cuentos completos. Alianza Editorial. (Original work published 1812)

Han, B. C. (2017). La expulsión de lo distinto. Herder Editorial.

Hargaden, H., & Fenton, B. (2005). An analysis of nonverbal transactions drawing on theories of intersubjectivity. Transactional Analysis Journal, 35(2), 173–186. https://doi.org/10.1177/036215370503500207

Haykin, M. D. (1980). Type casting: The influence of early childhood experience upon the structure of the Child ego state. Transactional Analysis Journal, 10(4), 354–364. https://doi.org/10.1177/036215378001000418

Hobson, P. (2004). The cradle of thought: Exploring the origins of thinking. Oxford University Press.

Kohut, H. (1971). The analysis of the self: A systematic approach to the psychoanalytic treatment of narcissistic personality disorders. University of Chicago Press.

Lacan, J. (1991). The seminar of Jacques Lacan: Book I. Norton. (Original work published 1975)

Martínez, J. M. (2013). Transferencia y contratransferencia en los trastornos de la personalidad [Transference and countertransference in personality disorders]. Revista de Análisis Transaccional [Journal of Transactional Analysis], 2, 43–60.

Martínez, J. M. (2016). Proceso relacional de grupo e intersubjetividad: La presencia y la sintonía como factores terapéuticos en psicoterapia de grupo [Group relations process and intersubjectivity: Presence and attunement as therapeutic factors in group psychotherapy]. Revista de Psicoterapia [Journal of Psychotherapy], 27(105), 85–94. https://doi.org/10.33898/rdp.v27i105.146

Martínez, J. M. (2017a). Three relational and intersubjective levels in integrative psychotherapy. International Journal of Integrative Psychotherapy, 8, 16–25.

Martínez, J. M. (2017b). Relational methods and theories of intersubjectivity. International Journal of Integrative Psychotherapy, 8, 1–15.

Martínez, J. M. (2017c). Intersubjective aspects of relational group process: From exclusion to integration. International Journal of Integrative Psychotherapy, 8, 26–39.

Martínez, J. M. (2021). Viviendo en mundos imaginarios: Sintonía, indagación e implicación en el tratamiento de las psicosis [Living in imaginary worlds: Attunement, inquiry and involvement in the treatment of psychosis]. Revista de Psicoterapia [Journal of Psychotherapy], 32(118), 97–111. https://doi.org/

10.33898/rdp.v32i118.487

Martínez, J. M., & Fernández, B. (1991). Análisis estructural y transferencia en los trastornos límite [Structural analysis and transference in borderline disorders]. Revista Española de Análisis Transaccional [Spanish Journal of Transactional Analysis], 27, 1082–1099.

Martínez, J. M., & Fernández, B. (2013). Tres dinámicas en los intentos de suicidio [Three dynamics in suicide attempts]. Revista de Análisis Transaccional [Journal of Transactional Analysis], 61–76.

Meltzoff, A. N., & Moore, M. K. (1977). Imitation of facial and manual gestures by human neonates. Science, 198(4312), 75–78. https://doi.org/10.1126/

science.897687

Meltzoff, A. N., & Moore, M. K. (1994). Imitation, memory, and the representations of persons. Infant Behavior and Development, 17(1), 83–99. https://doi.org/

10.1016/0163-6383(94)90024-8

Meltzoff, A. N., & Moore, M. K. (1997). Explaining facial imitation: A theoretical model. Early Development and Parenting, 6(3–4), 179–192. https://doi.org/

10.1002/(SICI)1099-0917(199709/12)6:3/4<179::AID-EDP157>3.0.CO;2-R

Meltzoff, A. N., & Moore, M. K. (1998). Infant intersubjectivity: Broadening the dialogue to include imitation, identity and intention. In S. Braten (Ed.), Intersubjective communication and emotion in early ontogeny (pp. 47–62). Cambridge University Press.

Ogden, T. H. (1994). Subjects of analysis. Aronson.

Piaget, J. (1977). El nacimiento de la inteligencia en el niño [The origins of intelligence in children]. Editorial Grijalbo. (Original work published 1952)

Premack, D., & Woodruff, G. (1978). Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1(4), 515–526. https://doi.org/10.1017/

S0140525X00076512

Racker, H. (1953). A contribution to the problem of counter-transference. The International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 34, 313–324.

Racker, H. (1957). The meanings and uses of countertransference. The Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 26, 303–357.

Schiff, J. L. (1975). Transactional analysis treatment of psychosis: Cathexis reader. Harper and Row Publishers.

Spezzano, C. (1996). The three faces of two-person psychology: development, ontology, and epistemology. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 6(5), 599–622. https://doi.org/10.1080/10481889609539141

Stern, D. (1985). The interpersonal world of the infant. A view from psychoanalysis and developmental psychology. Basic Books.

Stolorow, R. D., & Atwood, G. E. (1979). Faces in a cloud: Intersubjectivity in personality theory. Jason Aronson.

Stolorow, R. D., & Atwood, G. E. (2004). Contexts of being: The intersubjective foundations of psychological life. Analytic Press.

Wimmer, H., & Perner, J. (1983). Beliefs about beliefs: Representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children’s understanding of deception. Cognition, 13(1), 103–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(83)90004-5

Downloads

Published

2025-03-26

Issue

Section

Articles